Did I watch this? I forget.
Okay, yeah I watched it. Sue me, I thought Richard Grieco was too drunk to get work. Turns out he’s good for an opening sequence, anyways.
This movie evokes those non-porn Chuck Vincent epics of yore where he’d try to show porn actors could be in regular movies. Here you get Ginger Lynn Allen, Chasey Lain, Jenna Jameson, and others. They set this thing in Ireland so that some of these fine thespians could show what great Irish accents they have. Oy.
Still, I gotta give this flick credit for an eye-popping gore idea that reminds me why HOSTEL is for seventh-graders–one poor fellow gets the killer’s fist rammed up his butt and his snaky entrails yanked out by the handful. There’s even an extended version of it in the extras! Lots more yanking! Other than that, not so much fun.
They even try some meta-narrative a la THERE’S NOTHING OUT THERE (No, not SCREAM. Never SCREAM.). You know, the now old horror movie cliche where the horror character talks about horror cliches. Movies like that are devolutions into mimes. Not Shields and Yarnell mimes–I’m talking about the first form of Western stagework. Before tragedy and comedy, at festivals, early Greeks had a guy stand apart and do a funny narrative as a famous character. A few bits survive, and they’re perfect for the drunken festivals, but that’s about it. A horror movie that says explicitly to you “I’m a horror movie” is just like a sloppy drunk at a party belching and saying “I’m Jack Nicholson as a gynecologist. No, dude, totally, roll with me on this. Jack Nicholson…as a gynecologist! This is gonna be awesome! Cause I’m like totally not Jack Nicholoson, right?” I forget the cynic who said “Irony can be defined as the part the audience doesn’t get”, but in cases like this, he’s got something. The meta-narrative method of validating the ham-handedness of the movie while attempting ironic detachment on the part of the filmmakers (“No, I totally knew it was a piece of crap, dude! But…it was pretty awesome, right? I mean, for a dumb horror movie. What would be the point of trying anything new in a dumb horror movie, right?”) equals disaster.
Lets face it–you don’t have to make HOWARD’S END on no budget, but if you already have pretty girls willing to be naked in your movie, that means you can do more in your movie. A distributor will buy a movie with cute topless girls in it. You can try weird ideas. Look, DR CALIGARI, a flat insane experiment, got made and is still available (from a porn distributor, even though it’s not so much porn) because they hit it hard with the cute naked girl factor. They made it a part of things. They did the most insane flick they could think of (cowritten by Jerry Stahl in the middle of his Permanent Midnight). Why make the naked girls (or boys–David DeCoteau is proving there’s serious appeal in that in the traditionally boob-centric cheap horror realm) the reason AND the purpose of the movie. The naked girls can be the audience’s purpose for being there, but they don’t have to be your purpose for making the film.
Like porn, the money shot has swamped cheap horror. Pennywise auteurs are boiling and reboiling the must until it becomes the hardened crust on the pan, a cinematic barnacle that no-one can accuse of being a dolphin.




